Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureHowrey
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Abandoned Contract
Bankruptcy Court Holds Officer Personally Liable for Corporation’s Debt and Refuses to Discharge It

Still Can Comment
Federal Contractors Must Report Top Executive Pay and Subcontract Awards Under New Interim Rule

Contract Ambiguous?
Contractor Prevails on $36 Million in Claims Against L.A., Allowed to Seek More Damages from Jury

Liquidated Damages
Contractor Barred from Asserting Defenses Because It Failed to Submit Formal Claim to Navy

Monitoring Required
New Federal Stormwater Management Rules for Construction Sites: How They Work and How to Cope

$240 Million Fines
U.S. Steps Up Enforcement of Corruption Law Against International Companies, Executives; Whistleblower Bounties Expanded

Risk Created By Others
Subcontractor Held Liable to Workers Injured by Jobsite Hazard that It Did Not Report

Preliminary Injunction
Lender Ordered to Fund Construction Loan for Commercial Project; Green Financing Cited

Delegation to Arbitrator
Narrowed Role for Courts in Deciding Arbitrability Questions Confirmed by U.S. Supreme Court

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

State Agency Does Not Violate Due Process by Withholding Prevailing Wages and Penalties Without a Hearing


May 21, 2001


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A version of this article appears in the California Construction Law Reporter, published by the West Group.)


By James E. Acret

The California Labor Code requires contractors and subcontractors on public projects to pay a prevailing wage determined by the state. Public agencies are required to withhold from progress payments wages and penalties that have been forfeited for failure to pay prevailing wages. (§1727) If money is withheld from a contractor because of a subcontractor's failure to pay prevailing wages, the contractor may withhold such sums from the subcontractor. (§1729) The contractor may bring suit against the agency within 90 days of the completion of the contract and acceptance of the work to recover wages and penalties withheld. (§§1730, 1731, 1732)

As ordered by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, agencies withheld more than $135,000 in wages and penalties based on the alleged failure of G&G to pay prevailing wages. G&G asserted that the issuance of withholding orders without a hearing constituted a deprivation of property without due process of law in violation of the 14th Amendment. The District Court granted summary judgment; declared §§1727, 1730 to 1733, 1775, 1776 (g), and 1813 of the Labor Code unconstitutional; and enjoined the state from enforcing these provisions against G&G. REVERSED. Lujan v. G&G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2001 DJDAR 3701 (9th Cir. 2001).

"The Due Process Clause grants the aggrieved party the opportunity to present his case and have its merits fairly judged." G&G was not presently entitled to exercise dominion over the payment. G&G was deprived of a payment it contends it is owed under a contract based on the state's determination that G&G failure to comply with the contract's terms. G&G has only a claim that it did comply with those terms. This interest can be fully protected by an ordinary breach of contract suit. "We hold that if California makes ordinary judicial process available to respondent for resolving its contractual dispute, that process is due process."


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


To learn more about Howrey's Construction Practice Group, click here. For more information about books and other legal materials written by James Acret, click here and enter "Acret" in the site search engine. To learn more about topics covered in this article, contact Paul Berning at 415-848-4996 or at paulberning@howrey.com.



Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2001 Howrey LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Howrey LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us