Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureHowrey
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

AIA Form
Declaration of Default Not Required to Trigger Surety’s Liability on Performance Bond, Court Holds

AIA, EJCDC, Consensus
Key Construction Insurance Issues – How 3 Form Contracts Address Them

Unless Collusion
Insurer Bound by Results of Insured’s Trial or Finding that Settlement Was Reasonable, Washington Supreme Court Holds

For Arbitrator to Decide
Statute of Limitations Is No Bar to Compelling Arbitration, California Supreme Court Holds

Courts Intervene
Arbitration Decisions: Finality May Not Always Be Best

Contract So Provides
Court Distinguishes Duty to Defend from Duty to Indemnify, Requires Non-Negligent Supplier to Pay for Defense

'Deplorable' and 'Irrational'
Government Acted in Bad Faith in Default Termination; Court Awards $17 Million in Damages to Contractor

Unexpected Interpretations
Standard Form Contracts – Choice of Law Can Change Everything

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Colorado Supreme Court Holds Economic Loss Rule Bars Recovery in Negligence When Damages Arise from Breach of a Contract Duty


January 29, 2001


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A revised version of this article appears in The Construction Lawyer, Volume 21, No. 1, January 2001, published by the American Bar Association's Forum on the Construction Industry.)


By John W. Ralls
Howrey LLP

The Town of Alma, Colorado, entered into a contract with Azco Construction to build improvements to the town's water distribution system. Azco installed a number of flared fittings connecting new water mains to existing service lines. After the work was completed, some of these connections began to leak. Azco agreed to repair only the leaks that occurred during the one-year warranty period. The town sued the contractor to recover the cost of repairing and replacing the service line connections, asserting causes of action for breach of contract and negligence.

The trial court dismissed the negligence claim on the pleadings, based on the economic loss rule. The jury returned a verdict for the contractor on the breach of contract claim. Both the Colorado Court of Appeal and the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed. Town of Alma v. Azco Construction, Inc., 2000 WL 1336285, 2000 Colo. Lexis 1080 (Colo. 2000).

The issue presented to the Colorado Supreme Court was whether the plaintiffs' negligence claim was barred by the economic loss rule. After reviewing the development of the economic loss rule, the court stated its holding: "[W]e now expressly adopt the economic loss rule. We hold that a party suffering only economic loss from the breach of an express or implied contractual duty may not assert a tort claim for such a breach absent an independent duty of care under tort law. Economic loss is defined generally as damages other than physical harm to persons or property."

The court concluded that the town failed to demonstrate that the contractor breached any duty independent of its contractual obligations. The contract contained guaranty and warranty provisions imposing a contractual duty on the contractor to install a system free from defects and to repair defects that manifested themselves in the first year after final billing. The court also found that the damages were economic damages for the cost of repair and replacement of property. In order to recover such damages, there must be an independent duty of care (that is, independent of the contract). "As there is no independent duty to support [the town's] negligence claim, the economic loss rule bars this claim."

The court distinguished prior cases in which the contracts did not address the defendant's duty of care or there was a duty of care independent of contract. For instance, the court distinguished Lembke Plumbing and Heating v. Hayutin, 148 Colo. 334, 366 P.2d 673 (1961), in which it allowed a homeowner to pursue a negligence claim against a plumbing contractor for negligently installing pipes resulting in damage to the house. In Lembke, the contract imposed no duty upon the plumbing contractor to exercise due care and caution. "Because the contract did not address the defendant's duty of care, we found that the independent common law duty was not limited."

The court also reaffirmed its holding in Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. Weller, 663 P.2d 1041 (Colo. 1983), which involved a claim by a subsequent purchaser of a home against the developer. "Relying heavily on policy concerns about protecting homebuyers, we held that the plaintiffs could maintain a negligence action for latent defects in the home…. We allowed the negligence claim for latent defects in the home because we determined that a builder has an independent duty to act without negligence in the construction of a home."


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact John Ralls in our San Francisco office at 415-848-3362 or at rallsj@howrey.com or contact your Howrey attorney. For more information about Howrey's Construction Practice Group, click here.


Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2001 Howrey LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Howrey LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us