Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureThelen
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Communications Disconnect
Contractor’s Employee Intentionally Demolished Part of House, but Damage Is Covered by Insurance

Undue Prejudice from Delay
Laches Defense Bars Destruction of Condos for Copyright Violation, U.S. Court Holds

Compilation Has Value
Project Files, Bids, Contractor Budgets Can Be Trade Secrets, California Court Holds

Duty Of Good Faith
Florida Developer Allowed to Sue for Bad Faith; Surety Failed to Obtain Independent Investigation

Specialized Knowledge
Drywaller, Estimator Were Properly Allowed to Give Expert Testimony, U.S. Appeals Court Rules

Ignores Own Memo
Washington State Agency Changes Position and Is Estopped from Enforcing Prevailing Wage Law by Supreme Court

Public-Private Partnerships
Private Financing of Infrastructure in California: Overview of PPP Opportunities and Challenges

'Material Effect'
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Needed to Impose False Claims Act Liability on Subcontractors

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Louisiana Contractor Sentenced to 3 Years for Diverting Construction Funds


February 4, 2002


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

By Scott S. Shepardson
Thelen LLP

The treasurer of a construction company was sentenced to jail for misapplication of funds on two residential construction projects. Louisiana v. Cohn, 783 So.2d 1269 (La. 2001). Howard Cohn, secretary-treasurer of TCM, Inc., was sentenced to three years in prison for failure to properly direct payments to contractors and materialmen on the projects he was supervising.

TCM entered into two separate contracts in 1993 to build houses, one for Douglas Broussard and the other for Robert Jamison. Both contracts specified construction was to be completed within six months. From the outset, both projects were behind schedule and suffered from numerous errors in construction. Cohn was site supervisor for both projects. Cohn eventually was removed as site supervisor on the Broussard project. By May 1994, Broussard had taken over supervision of the construction site of his own home. Near that time, Jamison was informed by TCM that it was quitting construction of his home because of financial problems.

At the time TCM left the job sites, both homes were about 85 percent complete. Broussard used the remaining portion of his construction loan and $4,000 of his own money to complete construction. Jamison spent $3,000 of his own money and used friends for labor to complete his home. Upon completion, contractors and material suppliers who were not paid by TCM for work or materials used on the homes filed liens against both projects. Broussard paid $14,000 and Jamison paid $10,000 out of their own pockets to satisfy the liens.

Broussard and Jamison filed criminal complaints against TCM and its individual officers for violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes §§14:202 (A). That statute makes it a criminal offense for any construction contractor to knowingly fail to apply money received to settle claims for material and labor due for the construction or under the contract. The cases went to trial. The trial court found that TCM had no assets before the start of the construction projects. Accordingly, the only monies available to it during the projects were those received from Broussard and Jamison.

The Supreme Court looked at the expenditures on the project and noted that TCM had used monies provided by Broussard to purchase materials for the Jamison project and vice-versa. TCM also had made payments to Cohn for project supervision after he had been removed from the Broussard project, made payments on loans not part of either project and paid its officers supervisory fees without delay even when it was clear that TCM was expecting to be paid less at completion than it needed for materials and labor necessary to finish the projects.

The jury acquitted two officers of TCM, but Cohn was sentenced to three years at hard labor. The sentence was suspended, but Cohn was placed on probation on condition that he pay restitution. The Court of Appeal overturned the conviction, but on further appeal, the Supreme Court of Louisiana upheld the conviction and sentence.

"[T]he statute requires more than simply pro[ving] that a contractor has left unpaid claims for materials and labor at the end of a construction contract. The statute clearly does not criminalize a bad business deal made by a contractor who otherwise applies all of the funds received under the contract for legitimate expenses and claims for materials and labor in the course of the project, although he cannot pay all of them because, for one reason or another, the project has exceeded its estimated costs."

But, the Supreme Court noted that it was clear that TCM had not applied the monies received from each homeowner to his respective project. Rather, payments were commingled. In addition, at the end of the projects, materialmen from both projects were not paid. The Supreme Court held that it was a rational finding by the jury that Cohn, as the treasurer, had knowingly failed to apply the money received under each contract to settle the claims for material and labor due on each project, thus violating the statute. Consequently, the sentence was affirmed.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form.


For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact Scott S. Shepardson in our San Francisco office at 415-369-7184 or at sshepardson@thelen.com or contact your Thelen attorney. For more information about Thelen's Construction and Government Contracts Department, click here.





©2002 Thelen LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Thelen LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us