Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architecture
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About CWL ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Federal Preemption
Developer's Claim for Indemnity Against Architect for ADA and FHA Violations Rejected

Not Like Private Deals
City Contract May Not Be Modified Orally or by Course of Dealing, Court Holds

Business Risk Exclusion
CGL Insurer that Refused to Defend, Pay Claim Penalized, Held Liable

Little Known Hazard
Plumbers Burned as a Result of Natural Gas 'Odor Fade,' but Damage Award Reversed

Could Apply Broadly
Design Professional Denied Protection of Contract's Liability Limit by Florida Court

Part Of Lung Removed
Contractor Escapes Liability When Plaintiff Cannot Tie Infectious Fungus to Jobsite Dirt Stockpile

Disgorgement Order
Court Allows Discharge in Bankruptcy of Penalty for Violation of Contractor Licensing Law

Obligations Discharged
When Surety Takes Over Project, Owner Cannot Object to Replacement Contractor, Court Holds

Default Judgment
Notice, Accident, Own Work Defenses Rejected in Claims by General Contractor Against Plumber's Insurer

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

California Supreme Court Bars Recovery for Economic Losses in the Absence of Physical Damage from Construction Defects


December 18, 2000


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

ConstructionWebLinks.com

The California Supreme Court has held that when construction defects do not cause property damage, the plaintiff homeowner and homeowners' association bringing actions in negligence against the developer, contractor and subcontractor that built the dwellings are barred from recovering damages for economic loss. Aas v. Superior Court of San Diego County, __ Cal.4th ___; 2000 Cal. LEXIS 9048 (2000).

Applying the principles of the economic loss doctrine, as established in Seely v. White Motor Co., 63 Cal.2d 9 (1965), the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff suing for pure economic loss, without suffering property damage, is limited to its contractual and warranty-based remedies and cannot recover such damages in negligence or strict liability. In so ruling, the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeal's decision in Aas v. Superior Court, 64 Cal.App.4th 916 (1998).

The plaintiffs in the consolidated Aas action consisted of an individual homeowner (Aas v. Superior Court) and a homeowners' association (Provencal Community Association v. Superior Court), both of which had sued defendants Lyon Communities, Inc. and William Lyon Co., the developer and general contractor, for alleged construction defects. Plaintiffs sought to recover the cost of repairing the alleged defects. Plaintiffs alleged defects that violated building codes but did not result in physical damage to the property. Plaintiffs in the Aas action also sought damages for diminution in value of their residence.

In pretrial proceedings, defendants moved for orders in limine to exclude evidence of alleged defects that did not cause property damage. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's ruling granting the motions in limine. Finding that liability in an action brought in negligence is limited to damages for physical injuries, the court reasoned that recovery for economic loss is limited to contract and warranty actions in which the manufacturer has agreed to accept liability for the "lost benefit of the bargain, such as the cost of repairing a defective product or compensation for its diminished value."

The court rejected plaintiff's argument that the holding in J'Aire Corp. v. Gregory, 24 Cal.3d 799 (1979) allowed for recovery of economic damages. In J'Aire, the court permitted recovery of economic losses in a negligence action despite the absence of physical or personal injury on grounds that a special relationship, as established in Biakanja v. Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647 (1959), existed. The special relationship was defined by the J'Aire court in a six-factor balancing test. The Aas court found the facts before it did not "justify a broad rule permitting recovery of repair costs unaccompanied by property damage or personal injury." The court held that when construction defects have not caused physical damage, no special relationship could exist because under the third J'Aire factor, there was a lack of certainty that the plaintiff had suffered injury. The court found that the fundamental prerequisite for a tort claim, the existence of harm, was lacking because the harm alleged was so speculative that it was not "cognizable in tort."

The court rejected plaintiffs' reliance on Huang v. Garner, 157 Cal.App.3d 404 (1984) for the proposition that alleged defects not causing property damage were of sufficient certainty under the J'Aire factors to create a special relationship allowing recovery of economic loss damages. Huang involved an action by a real estate investor's claim against a developer for alleged construction defects, some of which had caused property damage. The Huang court reasoned that under the J'Aire factors, notices of abatement citing likely structural failure and requiring specific repairs established the requisite "certainty" of injury. The court disapproved of the holding in Huang to the extent it allowed recovery of repair costs in an action for negligence when there had been no property damage.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2000 ConstructionWebLinks, Inc.

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© ConstructionWebLinks, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About CWL ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us