Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureThelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

No Own Work Exclusion
Florida, South Carolina Supreme Courts Hold that Contractors’ CGL Policies Cover Damages Arising from Subs’ Defective Work

Rate-Gouging Alleged
Freely Negotiated Wholesale Energy Contracts Are Presumed Enforceable Unless They Seriously Harm Public Interest, U.S. Supreme Court Holds

State Law Pre-Empted
Materials in New Home Constitute Interstate Commerce, So Federal Arbitration Act Controls, California Court Holds

29 Lawyers Honored
Thelen Receives 2008 Chambers Award for Excellence in Construction Law

Essence Is Voluntary
Party Cannot Be Compelled to Participate in, Pay for Mediation, California Court Holds

Immigration Issue
Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify to Check Employee Work Status, President Orders

New or Significantly Improved
$38 Billion in U.S. Loan Guarantees for Alternative Energy Technologies – Overview of Selection Process and Financing Terms

New FAR Rule
Federal Contractors Can Lose Out on Projects, Be Debarred for Tax Delinquencies

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Oregon Court of Appeal Rejects Attack on Award of Light Rail Project Without Competitive Bidding


December 11, 2000


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A revised version of this article will appear in The Construction Lawyer, Volume 21, No. 1, January 2001, published by the American Bar Association's Forum on the Construction Industry.)


By John W. Ralls
Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP

Under Oregon Revised Statutes §279.015 (6), a public agency may exempt a contract from competitive bidding by finding "[i]t is unlikely that such exemption will encourage favoritism in the awarding of public contracts or substantially diminish competition for public contracts" and "[t]he awarding of public contracts pursuant to the exemption will result in substantial cost savings to the public contracting agency."

The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District issued a decision exempting from competitive bidding a contract to design and construct a light rail extension to Portland International Airport. Tri-Met then proceeded to award the work to Bechtel Infrastructure. Under the contract, Bechtel not only would design and build the new line but also would provide significant project funding. In return, Bechtel would receive a lump sum of $125 million as well as development rights along one segment of the line.

Associated Builders and Contractors, a trade association for non-union contractors, filed a petition challenging the exemption and the award. The trial court denied the petition. The Oregon Court of Appeal affirmed. Associated Builders and Constructors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, 2000 WL 1470135, 2000 Ore. App. Lexis 1679 (Ore. App. 2000).

On appeal, ABC argued that a contracting agency cannot both exempt a public contract from all competitive requirements and find, as the statute requires, that doing so will not reduce competition for that contract. According to ABC, a public agency may exempt a contract from competitive bidding only if it employs an "alternative contracting method" such as design-build. ABC argued that if the public agency desires to use such a method of contracting, it still must engage in a competitive procurement process of some kind.

The court rejected the argument that an agency cannot both exempt the contract and make the finding that the statute requires. The court held Tri-Met's findings to be sufficient because those findings made it clear that no contractor other than Bechtel could have performed the unique terms of the contract. The board found that because of the unique terms of the contract, "Bechtel is necessarily a sole source entity for this contract."

ABC also argued that even if Tri-Met could exempt the general contract from all competitive requirements, it could do so only if it considered the effect that the exemption would have on the subcontractors who would want to work on the project. Before the award, Bechtel advised Tri-Met it would comply with the Heavy and Highway National Agreement between a contractor's association and the AFL-CIO. This national agreement requires that all subcontractors sign the agreement or an appropriate local collective bargaining agreement. ABC argued that award to Bechtel effectively would prevent non-union subcontractors from competing for work on the project. ABC argued that by eliminating non-union contractors, competition for public contracts would be substantially diminished, in violation of the statute. The court rejected this argument on the ground that subcontracts are not "public contracts." Although Bechtel will pay its subcontractors out of funds it receives from Tri-Met, the distinguishing characteristic of a public contract is that the public agency is responsible for paying the contractor.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form.


For more information about the issues covered in this report, please contact John Ralls in our San Francisco office at 415-369-7210 or at jralls@thelen.com or contact your Thelen attorney. For more information about Thelen's Construction and Government Contracts Department, click here.





©2000 Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us