Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureThelen
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Undue Prejudice from Delay
Laches Defense Bars Destruction of Condos for Copyright Violation, U.S. Court Holds

Compilation Has Value
Project Files, Bids, Contractor Budgets Can Be Trade Secrets, California Court Holds

Duty Of Good Faith
Florida Developer Allowed to Sue for Bad Faith; Surety Failed to Obtain Independent Investigation

Specialized Knowledge
Drywaller, Estimator Were Properly Allowed to Give Expert Testimony, U.S. Appeals Court Rules

Ignores Own Memo
Washington State Agency Changes Position and Is Estopped from Enforcing Prevailing Wage Law by Supreme Court

Public-Private Partnerships
Private Financing of Infrastructure in California: Overview of PPP Opportunities and Challenges

'Material Effect'
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Proof Needed to Impose False Claims Act Liability on Subcontractors

Got Early Completion
Owner’s Oral Promise to Pay Subcontractor Enforced by Massachusetts Court

Bankruptcy Code Is No Bar
Bankrupt Sub’s Claim Against General Contractor Is a Non-Core Proceeding and Must Be Arbitrated, U.S. Court Holds

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Union May Enforce Mechanic's Lien for Fringe Benefits; No ERISA Pre-Emption


April 15, 2002


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A version of this article will appear in the California Construction Law Reporter, published by the West Group.)


By James E. Acret

Union workers employed by a subcontractor on a residential construction project recorded a mechanic's lien for $33,236.56 when fringe benefits required by their collective bargaining agreement were not paid. The workers and the union filed a foreclosure suit. The trial court held that the mechanic's lien remedy was pre-empted by ERISA and sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. The Court of Appeals reversed. Betancourt v. Storke Housing Investors, 94 Cal.App.4th 709, 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 551 (2001).

The trial court relied on the California Supreme Court's decision in Carpenters So. Cal. Admin. Corp. v. El Capitan Development Co., 53 Cal.3d 1041 (1991). Since the El Capitan decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has narrowed the field of laws pre-empted by ERISA. 29 USC §1144 (a) states that ERISA "shall supersede any and all state laws insofar as they may… relate to any employee benefit plan…."

The U.S. Supreme Court now holds that §1144 (a) pre-empts only state laws that affect the nature of employee benefit plans and the objectives of ERISA. Furthermore, pre-emption applies only when a state law acts immediately and exclusively upon ERISA plans and when the existence of ERISA plans is essential to the operation of the state law. The high court assumes that ERISA does not pre-empt areas of traditional state regulation.

Wages are of traditional state concern and are not included in ERISA's definition of an employee benefit plan. Here, the workers and their union rely on Civil Code §3110, which relates to wages, rather than on §3111, which grants lien rights specifically to fringe benefit trusts. (The trust is not a party to this action.) This distinguishes the present case from El Capitan, in which trust funds were plaintiffs and were, therefore, pursuing a remedy that was viewed as creating an alternative funding mechanism specifically related to ERISA.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form.


To learn more about Thelen's Construction and Government Contracts Department, click here. For more information about books and other legal materials written by James Acret, click here and enter "Acret" in the Search Products Field. To learn more about topics covered in this article, contact Paul Berning at (415) 369-7229 or at pwberning@thelen.com.






©2002 Thelen LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Thelen LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Thelen ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us