Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architectureHowrey
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Abandoned Contract
Bankruptcy Court Holds Officer Personally Liable for Corporation’s Debt and Refuses to Discharge It

Still Can Comment
Federal Contractors Must Report Top Executive Pay and Subcontract Awards Under New Interim Rule

Contract Ambiguous?
Contractor Prevails on $36 Million in Claims Against L.A., Allowed to Seek More Damages from Jury

Liquidated Damages
Contractor Barred from Asserting Defenses Because It Failed to Submit Formal Claim to Navy

Monitoring Required
New Federal Stormwater Management Rules for Construction Sites: How They Work and How to Cope

$240 Million Fines
U.S. Steps Up Enforcement of Corruption Law Against International Companies, Executives; Whistleblower Bounties Expanded

Risk Created By Others
Subcontractor Held Liable to Workers Injured by Jobsite Hazard that It Did Not Report

Preliminary Injunction
Lender Ordered to Fund Construction Loan for Commercial Project; Green Financing Cited

Delegation to Arbitrator
Narrowed Role for Courts in Deciding Arbitrability Questions Confirmed by U.S. Supreme Court

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Union May Enforce Mechanic's Lien for Fringe Benefits; No ERISA Pre-Emption


April 15, 2002


Back to Industry Newsletters
 

(A version of this article appears in the California Construction Law Reporter, published by the West Group.)


By James E. Acret

Union workers employed by a subcontractor on a residential construction project recorded a mechanic's lien for $33,236.56 when fringe benefits required by their collective bargaining agreement were not paid. The workers and the union filed a foreclosure suit. The trial court held that the mechanic's lien remedy was pre-empted by ERISA and sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. The Court of Appeals reversed. Betancourt v. Storke Housing Investors, 94 Cal.App.4th 709, 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 551 (2001).

The trial court relied on the California Supreme Court's decision in Carpenters So. Cal. Admin. Corp. v. El Capitan Development Co., 53 Cal.3d 1041 (1991). Since the El Capitan decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has narrowed the field of laws pre-empted by ERISA. 29 USC §1144 (a) states that ERISA "shall supersede any and all state laws insofar as they may… relate to any employee benefit plan…."

The U.S. Supreme Court now holds that §1144 (a) pre-empts only state laws that affect the nature of employee benefit plans and the objectives of ERISA. Furthermore, pre-emption applies only when a state law acts immediately and exclusively upon ERISA plans and when the existence of ERISA plans is essential to the operation of the state law. The high court assumes that ERISA does not pre-empt areas of traditional state regulation.

Wages are of traditional state concern and are not included in ERISA's definition of an employee benefit plan. Here, the workers and their union rely on Civil Code §3110, which relates to wages, rather than on §3111, which grants lien rights specifically to fringe benefit trusts. (The trust is not a party to this action.) This distinguishes the present case from El Capitan, in which trust funds were plaintiffs and were, therefore, pursuing a remedy that was viewed as creating an alternative funding mechanism specifically related to ERISA.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.


To learn more about Howrey's Construction Practice Group, click here. For more information about books and other legal materials written by James Acret, click here and enter "Acret" in the site search engine. To learn more about topics covered in this article, contact Paul Berning at 415-848-4996 or at paulberning@howrey.com.



Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2002 Howrey LLP

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© Howrey LLP
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About Howrey ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us