Construction Web guide: infrastructure, buildings, engineering, architecture
Web directory of federal, state, local governments; courts; legislatures; Congress; trade groups; businesses; colleges; libraries; publications; international agencies affecting construction, engineering, architecture, infrastructure Web directory of resources on licensing, registration, building codes, new projects, bidding, financing, environment, specifications, e-commerce, laws, regulations, insurance, bonds, jobs, safety, best practices, engineering, architecture, training Web guide to dictionaries; encyclopedias; reference materials; business and international travel resources; people finders; telephone numbers; Web addresses; postal codes; currency, metric converters; time zones; calendars; travel; news
More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure
Site Search Site Map Registration About CWL ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us

Federal Preemption
Developer’s Claim for Indemnity Against Architect for ADA and FHA Violations Rejected

Not Like Private Deals
City Contract May Not Be Modified Orally or by Course of Dealing, Court Holds

Business Risk Exclusion
CGL Insurer that Refused to Defend, Pay Claim Penalized, Held Liable

Little Known Hazard
Plumbers Burned as a Result of Natural Gas ‘Odor Fade,’ but Damage Award Reversed

Could Apply Broadly
Design Professional Denied Protection of Contract’s Liability Limit by Florida Court

Part Of Lung Removed
Contractor Escapes Liability When Plaintiff Cannot Tie Infectious Fungus to Jobsite Dirt Stockpile

Disgorgement Order
Court Allows Discharge in Bankruptcy of Penalty for Violation of Contractor Licensing Law

Obligations Discharged
When Surety Takes Over Project, Owner Cannot Object to Replacement Contractor, Court Holds

Default Judgment
Notice, Accident, Own Work Defenses Rejected in Claims by General Contractor Against Plumber’s Insurer

Previous Issues

Construction Industry News

Florida Developer Allowed to Sue for Bad Faith; Surety Failed to Obtain Independent Investigation


September 22, 2008



ConstructionWebLinks.com

The developer of a shopping center declared the contractor in default for poor workmanship during construction, including structural defects and building code violations. The developer gave written notice of the default to the surety and demanded that the surety take action in accordance with the terms of the performance bond within five business days. The surety responded within four days, stating that it was “in the process of conducting an investigation into developer’s allegations and that it would follow up with the developer within three days.”

When the developer did not receive a response within the promised time, the developer wrote a second letter stating that: 1) the surety had not taken any action or advised of the action it intended to take regarding the contractor’s default; and 2) if the surety failed to take action within 15 days of the letter, the surety would be deemed to be in default on the bond.

One month later, the surety wrote the developer and took the position that the contractor had performed as required by the contract or that its subcontractors would correct any defects. The surety recommended that the developer “cooperate” with the contractor in resolving the claims. The developer responded that the contractor had made only a token effort to correct the defects. Subsequently, it accused the surety of sitting idly by and ignoring its obligations.

The developer commenced an arbitration proceeding against the contractor and received an arbitration award of $1,417,842. The arbitrators expressly denied the surety’s defenses and bound the surety to the award to the same extent as the contractor. The contractor paid the arbitration award.

The developer then sued the surety under Florida Statutes Annotated §624.155(1)(b)(1) for bad faith refusal to attempt to settle. The developer asserted that the surety had ignored its obligations under the bond by attempting to delay the arbitration; by repeatedly failing to address the developer’s complaints about defective work; and by doing so without conducting an independent investigation into the developer’s complaints. The surety moved for summary judgment, and the U.S. District Court granted the motion. The developer appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit certified five questions to the Florida Supreme Court, which answered the questions. The 11th Circuit then reversed and remanded the case for trial. Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 483 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2007).

First, the Court of Appeals held that the developer, as obligee of a surety bond, is considered an insured and has the right to sue the surety for bad faith refusal to settle claims under §624.155(1)(b)(1). It relied on the Florida Supreme Court’s analysis, which pointed to statutory language, legislative history and treatment of the issue in other jurisdictions.

Second, the Court of Appeals held that the arbitration award against the contractor was sufficient to establish the validity of the developer’s underlying claim and thereby satisfied a condition precedent to a §624.155(1)(b)(1) suit.

Third, the Court of Appeals held that the developer had not forfeited its §624.155(1)(b)(1) claim by failing to pursue it as a breach of contract claim in the arbitration. It noted that the claim had not accrued by the time of the arbitration.

Fourth, the Court of Appeals held that the developer did not have to allege and prove that the surety’s misconduct constituted a general practice in order to make a §624.155(1)(b)(1) claim.

Fifth, the Court of Appeals held that the surety was collaterally estopped from raising the same defenses in the bad faith case as were rejected in the arbitration. However, it noted that the Florida Supreme Court held that the surety was permitted to attempt to prove in the §624.155(1)(b)(1) case that it had a reasonable and good faith factual basis for the defenses it asserted.

The Court of Appeals also held that there were sufficient factual disputes to preclude summary judgment. The Court of Appeals noted the developer had put forward evidence that the surety never directly communicated with the developer in response to its default letter and that the surety did not hire any consultants, engineers or other experts to investigate the claimed construction defects. It also noted that there was evidence the surety did not timely respond to the developer’s claims.

The Court of Appeals noted that the performance bond might not, by its express terms, have required the surety to conduct an investigation into the developer’s claim. However, it noted that, under Florida law, the duty to investigate the insured’s claim can arise by virtue of the insurer’s common law duty of good faith and fair dealing. It noted that Florida’s bad faith statute obligates an insurer to act in good faith and with due regard for the interest of the insured. The duty of good faith requires an insurer to “use the same degree of care and diligence as a person of ordinary care and prudence should exercise in the management of its own business.” Under Florida law, the surety’s conduct should be evaluated under all of the circumstances of the particular case, the Court of Appeals wrote,.


If you would like to receive legal reports and updates more quickly, by e-mail, click here and fill out the mailing list form. If you would like to subscribe to our RSS feeds or learn more about RSS, click here.



Send This Report to a Colleague

Tools to Share, Organize, Comment on Information


©2008 ConstructionWebLinks, Inc.

More than 500 online news and legal reports on construction law, including claims, payment remedies, damages, government contracting, insurance, building codes, licensing, technology, arbitration, engineering, architecture, infrastructure

© ConstructionWebLinks, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Legal notices, and terms and conditions.

Site Search Site Map Registration About CWL ConstructionWebLinks Contact Us